Core/grin
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin.git synced 2025-01-21 03:21:08 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Doc tweaks after feedback

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Ignotus Peverell 2017-10-13 16:09:16 +00:00
parent 9a230ca7f6
commit dd90031902
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 99CD25F39F8F8211
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/grin4bitcoiners.md
View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ There are 3 main properties of Grin transactions that make them private:
2. There are no amounts. 2. There are no amounts.
3. 2 transactions, one spending the other, can be merged in a block to form only one, removing all intermediary information. 3. 2 transactions, one spending the other, can be merged in a block to form only one, removing all intermediary information.
The 2 first properties mean that all transactions look the same. Unless you directly participated in the transaction, all inputs and outputs look like random pieces of data (in lingo, they all look like random curve points). The 2 first properties mean that all transactions look the same. Unless you directly participated in the transaction, all inputs and outputs look like random pieces of data (in lingo, they're all random curve points).
## Scalability ## Scalability
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Maybe you've heard that MimbleWimble doesn't support scripts. And in some way, t
### Wait, what!? No address? ### Wait, what!? No address?
Nope, no address. All outputs in Grin are unique and have no common data with any previous output. Instead of relying on a known address to send money, transactions have to be built interactively, with 2 (or more) wallets exchanging data with one another. Practically, this isn't so much of a problem as there are multiple ways for 2 programs to interact privately and securely. Nope, no address. All outputs in Grin are unique and have no common data with any previous output. Instead of relying on a known address to send money, transactions have to be built interactively, with 2 (or more) wallets exchanging data with one another. Practically, this isn't so much of a problem as there are multiple ways for 2 programs to interact privately and securely. And this interaction could even take place over email or Signal (or carrier pigeons).
### If transactions information get removed, can't I just cheat and create money? ### If transactions information get removed, can't I just cheat and create money?