2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2018 The Grin Developers
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//! Top-level Pool type, methods, and tests
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
use std::sync::Arc;
|
|
|
|
use time;
|
|
|
|
use rand;
|
|
|
|
use rand::Rng;
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::hash::Hash;
|
2018-02-16 18:42:27 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::hash::Hashed;
|
|
|
|
use core::core::id::ShortIdentifiable;
|
2018-02-10 01:32:16 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::transaction;
|
2018-02-16 18:42:27 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::{OutputIdentifier, Transaction};
|
|
|
|
use core::core::{block, hash};
|
|
|
|
use util::LOGGER;
|
|
|
|
use util::secp::pedersen::Commitment;
|
2018-02-10 01:32:16 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
use types::*;
|
|
|
|
pub use graph;
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// The pool itself.
|
|
|
|
/// The transactions HashMap holds ownership of all transactions in the pool,
|
|
|
|
/// keyed by their transaction hash.
|
2017-06-10 21:31:05 +03:00
|
|
|
pub struct TransactionPool<T> {
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
config: PoolConfig,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// All transactions hash in the stempool with a time attached to ensure
|
|
|
|
/// propagation
|
|
|
|
pub time_stem_transactions: HashMap<hash::Hash, i64>,
|
|
|
|
/// All transactions in the stempool
|
|
|
|
pub stem_transactions: HashMap<hash::Hash, Box<transaction::Transaction>>,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// All transactions in the pool
|
|
|
|
pub transactions: HashMap<hash::Hash, Box<transaction::Transaction>>,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// The stem pool
|
|
|
|
pub stempool: Pool,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// The pool itself
|
|
|
|
pub pool: Pool,
|
|
|
|
/// Orphans in the pool
|
|
|
|
pub orphans: Orphans,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// blockchain is a DummyChain, for now, which mimics what the future
|
|
|
|
// chain will offer to the pool
|
|
|
|
blockchain: Arc<T>,
|
2017-10-26 00:06:24 +03:00
|
|
|
adapter: Arc<PoolAdapter>,
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
impl<T> TransactionPool<T>
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: BlockChain,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/// Create a new transaction pool
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
pub fn new(config: PoolConfig, chain: Arc<T>, adapter: Arc<PoolAdapter>) -> TransactionPool<T> {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
TransactionPool {
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
config: config,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
time_stem_transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
|
|
|
stem_transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
stempool: Pool::empty(),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
pool: Pool::empty(),
|
|
|
|
orphans: Orphans::empty(),
|
|
|
|
blockchain: chain,
|
2017-10-26 00:06:24 +03:00
|
|
|
adapter: adapter,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-16 18:42:27 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Query the tx pool for all known txs based on kernel short_ids
|
|
|
|
/// from the provided compact_block.
|
|
|
|
/// Note: does not validate that we return the full set of required txs.
|
|
|
|
/// The caller will need to validate that themselves.
|
|
|
|
pub fn retrieve_transactions(&self, cb: &block::CompactBlock) -> Vec<Transaction> {
|
|
|
|
debug!(
|
|
|
|
LOGGER,
|
|
|
|
"pool: retrieve_transactions: kern_ids - {:?}, txs - {}, {:?}",
|
|
|
|
cb.kern_ids,
|
|
|
|
self.transactions.len(),
|
|
|
|
self.transactions.keys(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut txs = vec![];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for tx in self.transactions.values() {
|
|
|
|
for kernel in &tx.kernels {
|
|
|
|
// rehash each kernel to calculate the block specific short_id
|
2018-03-01 21:25:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let short_id = kernel.short_id(&cb.hash(), cb.nonce);
|
2018-02-16 18:42:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// if any kernel matches then keep the tx for later
|
|
|
|
if cb.kern_ids.contains(&short_id) {
|
|
|
|
txs.push(*tx.clone());
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debug!(
|
|
|
|
LOGGER,
|
|
|
|
"pool: retrieve_transactions: matching txs from pool - {}",
|
|
|
|
txs.len(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
txs
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Searches for an output, designated by its commitment, from the current
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
/// best Output view, presented by taking the best blockchain Output set (as
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// determined by the blockchain component) and rectifying pool spent and
|
|
|
|
/// unspents.
|
|
|
|
/// Detects double spends and unknown references from the pool and
|
|
|
|
/// blockchain only; any conflicts with entries in the orphans set must
|
|
|
|
/// be accounted for separately, if relevant.
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
pub fn search_for_best_output(&self, output_ref: &OutputIdentifier) -> Parent {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// The current best unspent set is:
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// Pool unspent + (blockchain unspent - pool->blockchain spent)
|
|
|
|
// Pool unspents are unconditional so we check those first
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.search_stempool_spents(&output_ref.commit)
|
|
|
|
.or(self.pool.get_available_output(&output_ref.commit).map(|x| {
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
let tx_ref = x.source_hash().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
Parent::PoolTransaction { tx_ref }
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
.or(self.stempool
|
|
|
|
.get_available_output(&output_ref.commit)
|
|
|
|
.map(|x| {
|
|
|
|
let tx_ref = x.source_hash().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
Parent::StemPoolTransaction { tx_ref }
|
|
|
|
}))
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
.or(self.search_blockchain_unspents(output_ref))
|
|
|
|
.or(self.search_pool_spents(&output_ref.commit))
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.unwrap_or(Parent::Unknown)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// search_blockchain_unspents searches the current view of the blockchain
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// unspent set, represented by blockchain unspents - pool spents, for an
|
|
|
|
// output designated by output_commitment.
|
|
|
|
fn search_blockchain_unspents(&self, output_ref: &OutputIdentifier) -> Option<Parent> {
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.blockchain.is_unspent(output_ref).ok().map(|_| {
|
|
|
|
match self.pool.get_blockchain_spent(&output_ref.commit) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
let other_tx = x.destination_hash().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
Parent::AlreadySpent { other_tx }
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
None => match self.stempool.get_blockchain_spent(&output_ref.commit) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
let other_tx = x.destination_hash().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
Parent::AlreadySpent { other_tx }
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => Parent::BlockTransaction,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// search_pool_spents is the second half of pool input detection, after the
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// available_outputs have been checked. This returns either a
|
|
|
|
// Parent::AlreadySpent or None.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
fn search_pool_spents(&self, output_commitment: &Commitment) -> Option<Parent> {
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.pool
|
|
|
|
.get_internal_spent(output_commitment)
|
|
|
|
.map(|x| Parent::AlreadySpent {
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
other_tx: x.destination_hash().unwrap(),
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
})
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// search_pool_spents is the second half of pool input detection, after the
|
|
|
|
// available_outputs have been checked. This returns either a
|
|
|
|
// Parent::AlreadySpent or None.
|
|
|
|
fn search_stempool_spents(&self, output_commitment: &Commitment) -> Option<Parent> {
|
|
|
|
self.stempool
|
|
|
|
.get_internal_spent(output_commitment)
|
|
|
|
.map(|x| Parent::AlreadySpent {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: x.destination_hash().unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Get the number of transactions in the stempool
|
|
|
|
pub fn stempool_size(&self) -> usize {
|
|
|
|
self.stempool.num_transactions()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Get the number of transactions in the pool
|
|
|
|
pub fn pool_size(&self) -> usize {
|
|
|
|
self.pool.num_transactions()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Get the number of orphans in the pool
|
|
|
|
pub fn orphans_size(&self) -> usize {
|
|
|
|
self.orphans.num_transactions()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Get the total size (stem transactions + transactions + orphans) of the
|
|
|
|
/// pool
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
pub fn total_size(&self) -> usize {
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.stempool.num_transactions() + self.pool.num_transactions()
|
|
|
|
+ self.orphans.num_transactions()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Attempts to add a transaction to the stempool or the memory pool.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
///
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Adds a transaction to the stem memory pool, deferring to the orphans pool
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// if necessary, and performing any connection-related validity checks.
|
|
|
|
/// Happens under an exclusive mutable reference gated by the write portion
|
|
|
|
/// of a RWLock.
|
|
|
|
pub fn add_to_memory_pool(
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
|
|
_: TxSource,
|
|
|
|
tx: transaction::Transaction,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
stem: bool,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
// Do we have the capacity to accept this transaction?
|
|
|
|
if let Err(e) = self.is_acceptable(&tx) {
|
|
|
|
return Err(e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// Making sure the transaction is valid before anything else.
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
tx.validate().map_err(|e| PoolError::InvalidTx(e))?;
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// The first check involves ensuring that an indentical transaction is not
|
|
|
|
// alreay in the stem transaction or regular transaction pool.
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// A non-authoritative similar check should be performed under the
|
|
|
|
// pool's read lock before we get to this point, which would catch the
|
|
|
|
// majority of duplicate cases. The race condition is caught here.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: When the transaction identifier is finalized, the assumptions
|
|
|
|
// here may change depending on the exact coverage of the identifier.
|
|
|
|
// The current tx.hash() method, for example, does not cover changes
|
|
|
|
// to fees or other elements of the signature preimage.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let tx_hash = graph::transaction_identifier(&tx);
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
if let Err(e) = self.check_pools(&tx_hash, stem) {
|
|
|
|
return Err(e);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Check that the transaction is mature
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let head_header = self.blockchain.head_header()?;
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
if let Err(e) = self.is_mature(&tx, &head_header) {
|
|
|
|
return Err(e);
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Here if we have a stem transaction, decide wether it will be broadcasted
|
|
|
|
// in stem or fluff phase
|
|
|
|
let mut rng = rand::thread_rng();
|
|
|
|
let random = rng.gen_range(0, 101);
|
|
|
|
let stem_propagation = random <= self.config.dandelion_probability;
|
|
|
|
let mut will_stem = stem && stem_propagation;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// The next issue is to identify all unspent outputs that
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// this transaction will consume and make sure they exist in the set.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let mut pool_refs: Vec<graph::Edge> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
let mut orphan_refs: Vec<graph::Edge> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
let mut blockchain_refs: Vec<graph::Edge> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for input in &tx.inputs {
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
let output = OutputIdentifier::from_input(&input);
|
|
|
|
let base = graph::Edge::new(None, Some(tx_hash), output.clone());
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that search_for_best_output does not examine orphans, by
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// design. If an incoming transaction consumes pool outputs already
|
|
|
|
// spent by the orphans set, this does not preclude its inclusion
|
|
|
|
// into the pool.
|
|
|
|
match self.search_for_best_output(&output) {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Parent::PoolTransaction { tx_ref: x } => pool_refs.push(base.with_source(Some(x))),
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
Parent::StemPoolTransaction { tx_ref: x } => {
|
|
|
|
if will_stem {
|
|
|
|
// Going to stem this transaction if parent is in stempool it's ok.
|
|
|
|
debug!(LOGGER, "Going is in stempool");
|
|
|
|
pool_refs.push(base.with_source(Some(x)));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
will_stem = true;
|
|
|
|
debug!(
|
|
|
|
LOGGER,
|
|
|
|
"Parent is in stempool, force transaction to go in stempool"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
pool_refs.push(base.with_source(Some(x)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
Parent::BlockTransaction => {
|
|
|
|
let height = head_header.height + 1;
|
|
|
|
self.blockchain.is_matured(&input, height)?;
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
blockchain_refs.push(base);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Parent::Unknown => orphan_refs.push(base),
|
|
|
|
Parent::AlreadySpent { other_tx: x } => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DoubleSpend {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: x,
|
|
|
|
spent_output: input.commitment(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let is_orphan = orphan_refs.len() > 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next we examine the outputs this transaction creates and ensure
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// that they do not already exist.
|
|
|
|
// I believe its worth preventing duplicate outputs from being
|
|
|
|
// accepted, even though it is possible for them to be mined
|
|
|
|
// with strict ordering. In the future, if desirable, this could
|
|
|
|
// be node policy config or more intelligent.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
for output in &tx.outputs {
|
|
|
|
self.check_duplicate_outputs(output, is_orphan)?
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assertion: we have exactly as many resolved spending references as
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// inputs to the transaction.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
|
|
tx.inputs.len(),
|
|
|
|
blockchain_refs.len() + pool_refs.len() + orphan_refs.len()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point we know if we're spending all known unspents and not
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// creating any duplicate unspents.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let pool_entry = graph::PoolEntry::new(&tx);
|
|
|
|
let new_unspents = tx.outputs
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
.map(|x| {
|
|
|
|
let output = OutputIdentifier::from_output(&x);
|
|
|
|
graph::Edge::new(Some(tx_hash), None, output)
|
|
|
|
})
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !is_orphan {
|
|
|
|
// In the non-orphan (pool) case, we've ensured that every input
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// maps one-to-one with an unspent (available) output, and each
|
|
|
|
// output is unique. No further checks are necessary.
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
if will_stem {
|
|
|
|
// Stem phase: transaction is added to the stem memory pool and broadcasted to a
|
|
|
|
// randomly selected node.
|
|
|
|
self.stempool.add_stempool_transaction(
|
|
|
|
pool_entry,
|
|
|
|
blockchain_refs,
|
|
|
|
pool_refs,
|
|
|
|
new_unspents,
|
|
|
|
);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.adapter.stem_tx_accepted(&tx);
|
|
|
|
self.stem_transactions.insert(tx_hash, Box::new(tx));
|
|
|
|
// Track this transaction
|
|
|
|
self.time_stem_transactions
|
|
|
|
.insert(tx_hash, time::now_utc().to_timespec().sec);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Fluff phase: transaction is added to memory pool and broadcasted normally
|
|
|
|
self.pool.add_pool_transaction(
|
|
|
|
pool_entry,
|
|
|
|
blockchain_refs,
|
|
|
|
pool_refs,
|
|
|
|
new_unspents,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
self.adapter.tx_accepted(&tx);
|
|
|
|
self.transactions.insert(tx_hash, Box::new(tx));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
self.reconcile_orphans().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we're pretty sure the transaction is an orphan,
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// but we have to explicitly check for double spends against the
|
|
|
|
// orphans set; we do not check this as part of the connectivity
|
|
|
|
// checking above.
|
|
|
|
// First, any references resolved to the pool need to be compared
|
|
|
|
// against active orphan pool_connections.
|
|
|
|
// Note that pool_connections here also does double duty to
|
|
|
|
// account for blockchain connections.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
for pool_ref in pool_refs.iter().chain(blockchain_refs.iter()) {
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
match self.orphans
|
|
|
|
.get_external_spent_output(&pool_ref.output_commitment())
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// Should the below err be subtyped to orphans somehow?
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DoubleSpend {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: x.destination_hash().unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
spent_output: x.output_commitment(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next, we have to consider the possibility of double spends
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// within the orphans set.
|
|
|
|
// We also have to distinguish now between missing and internal
|
|
|
|
// references.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let missing_refs = self.resolve_orphan_refs(tx_hash, &mut orphan_refs)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We have passed all failure modes.
|
|
|
|
pool_refs.append(&mut blockchain_refs);
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
error!(LOGGER, "Add to orphan");
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
self.orphans.add_orphan_transaction(
|
|
|
|
pool_entry,
|
|
|
|
pool_refs,
|
|
|
|
orphan_refs,
|
|
|
|
missing_refs,
|
|
|
|
new_unspents,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Err(PoolError::OrphanTransaction)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Check the output for a conflict with an existing output.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Checks the output (by commitment) against outputs in the blockchain
|
|
|
|
/// or in the pool. If the transaction is destined for orphans, the
|
|
|
|
/// orphans set is checked as well.
|
|
|
|
fn check_duplicate_outputs(
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
output: &transaction::Output,
|
|
|
|
is_orphan: bool,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
// Checking against current blockchain unspent outputs
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// We want outputs even if they're spent by pool txs, so we ignore
|
|
|
|
// consumed_blockchain_outputs
|
|
|
|
let out = OutputIdentifier::from_output(&output);
|
|
|
|
if self.blockchain.is_unspent(&out).is_ok() {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DuplicateOutput {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: None,
|
|
|
|
in_chain: true,
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
output: out.commit,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check for existence of this output in the pool
|
|
|
|
match self.pool.find_output(&output.commitment()) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DuplicateOutput {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: Some(x),
|
|
|
|
in_chain: false,
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
output: output.commit,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Check for existence of this output in the stempool
|
|
|
|
match self.stempool.find_output(&output.commitment()) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DuplicateOutput {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: Some(x),
|
|
|
|
in_chain: false,
|
|
|
|
output: output.commit,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// If the transaction might go into orphans, perform the same
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// checks as above but against the orphan set instead.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
if is_orphan {
|
|
|
|
// Checking against orphan outputs
|
|
|
|
match self.orphans.find_output(&output.commitment()) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DuplicateOutput {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: Some(x),
|
|
|
|
in_chain: false,
|
|
|
|
output: output.commitment(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// No need to check pool connections since those are covered
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// by pool unspents and blockchain connections.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Distinguish between missing, unspent, and spent orphan refs.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Takes the set of orphans_refs produced during transaction connectivity
|
|
|
|
/// validation, which do not point at valid unspents in the blockchain or
|
|
|
|
/// pool. These references point at either a missing (orphaned) commitment,
|
|
|
|
/// an unspent output of the orphans set, or a spent output either within
|
|
|
|
/// the orphans set or externally from orphans to the pool or blockchain.
|
|
|
|
/// The last case results in a failure condition and transaction acceptance
|
|
|
|
/// is aborted.
|
|
|
|
fn resolve_orphan_refs(
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
tx_hash: hash::Hash,
|
|
|
|
orphan_refs: &mut Vec<graph::Edge>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<HashMap<usize, ()>, PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
let mut missing_refs: HashMap<usize, ()> = HashMap::new();
|
|
|
|
for (i, orphan_ref) in orphan_refs.iter_mut().enumerate() {
|
|
|
|
let orphan_commitment = &orphan_ref.output_commitment();
|
|
|
|
match self.orphans.get_available_output(&orphan_commitment) {
|
|
|
|
// If the edge is an available output of orphans,
|
|
|
|
// update the prepared edge
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => *orphan_ref = x.with_destination(Some(tx_hash)),
|
|
|
|
// If the edge is not an available output, it is either
|
|
|
|
// already consumed or it belongs in missing_refs.
|
|
|
|
None => {
|
|
|
|
match self.orphans.get_internal_spent(&orphan_commitment) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DoubleSpend {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: x.destination_hash().unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
spent_output: x.output_commitment(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => {
|
|
|
|
// The reference does not resolve to anything.
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Make sure this missing_output has not already
|
|
|
|
// been claimed, then add this entry to
|
|
|
|
// missing_refs
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
match self.orphans.get_unknown_output(&orphan_commitment) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::DoubleSpend {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: x.destination_hash().unwrap(),
|
|
|
|
spent_output: x.output_commitment(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None => missing_refs.insert(i, ()),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(missing_refs)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// The primary goal of the reconcile_orphans method is to eliminate any
|
|
|
|
/// orphans who conflict with the recently accepted pool transaction.
|
|
|
|
/// TODO: How do we handle fishing orphans out that look like they could
|
|
|
|
/// be freed? Current thought is to do so under a different lock domain
|
|
|
|
/// so that we don't have the potential for long recursion under the write
|
|
|
|
/// lock.
|
|
|
|
pub fn reconcile_orphans(&self) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Updates the pool with the details of a new block.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Along with add_to_memory_pool, reconcile_block is the other major entry
|
|
|
|
/// point for the transaction pool. This method reconciles the records in
|
|
|
|
/// the transaction pool with the updated view presented by the incoming
|
|
|
|
/// block. This involves removing any transactions which appear to conflict
|
|
|
|
/// with inputs and outputs consumed in the block, and invalidating any
|
|
|
|
/// descendents or parents of the removed transaction, where relevant.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Returns a list of transactions which have been evicted from the pool
|
|
|
|
/// due to the recent block. Because transaction association information is
|
|
|
|
/// irreversibly lost in the blockchain, we must keep track of these
|
|
|
|
/// evicted transactions elsewhere so that we can make a best effort at
|
|
|
|
/// returning them to the pool in the event of a reorg that invalidates
|
|
|
|
/// this block.
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// TODO also consider stempool here
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
pub fn reconcile_block(
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
|
|
block: &block::Block,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<Vec<Box<transaction::Transaction>>, PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
// If this pool has been kept in sync correctly, serializing all
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// updates, then the inputs must consume only members of the blockchain
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// output set.
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// If the block has been resolved properly and reduced fully to its
|
|
|
|
// canonical form, no inputs may consume outputs generated by previous
|
|
|
|
// transactions in the block; they would be cut-through. TODO: If this
|
|
|
|
// is not consensus enforced, then logic must be added here to account
|
|
|
|
// for that.
|
|
|
|
// Based on this, we operate under the following algorithm:
|
|
|
|
// For each block input, we examine the pool transaction, if any, that
|
|
|
|
// consumes the same blockchain output.
|
|
|
|
// If one exists, we mark the transaction and then examine its
|
|
|
|
// children. Recursively, we mark each child until a child is
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// fully satisfied by outputs in the updated output view (after
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// reconciliation of the block), or there are no more children.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Additionally, to protect our invariant dictating no duplicate
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// outputs, each output generated by the new output set is checked
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// against outputs generated by the pool and the corresponding
|
|
|
|
// transactions are also marked.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// After marking concludes, sweeping begins. In order, the marked
|
|
|
|
// transactions are removed, the vertexes corresponding to the
|
|
|
|
// transactions are removed, all the marked transactions' outputs are
|
|
|
|
// removed, and all remaining non-blockchain inputs are returned to the
|
|
|
|
// unspent_outputs set.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// After the pool has been successfully processed, an orphans
|
|
|
|
// reconciliation job is triggered.
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
let mut marked_transactions: HashSet<hash::Hash> = HashSet::new();
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let mut marked_stem_transactions: HashSet<hash::Hash> = HashSet::new();
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
// find all conflicting txs based on inputs to the block
|
|
|
|
let conflicting_txs: HashSet<hash::Hash> = block
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.inputs
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| self.pool.get_external_spent_output(&x.commitment()))
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| x.destination_hash())
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// find all conflicting stem txs based on inputs to the block
|
|
|
|
let conflicting_stem_txs: HashSet<hash::Hash> = block
|
|
|
|
.inputs
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| self.stempool.get_external_spent_output(&x.commitment()))
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| x.destination_hash())
|
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
// find all outputs that conflict - potential for duplicates so use a HashSet
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// here
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
let conflicting_outputs: HashSet<hash::Hash> = block
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.outputs
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x: &transaction::Output| {
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
self.pool
|
|
|
|
.get_internal_spent_output(&x.commitment())
|
|
|
|
.or(self.pool.get_available_output(&x.commitment()))
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
})
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| x.source_hash())
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Similarly find all outputs that conflict in the stempool- potential for
|
|
|
|
// duplicates so use a HashSet here
|
|
|
|
let conflicting_stem_outputs: HashSet<hash::Hash> = block
|
|
|
|
.outputs
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x: &transaction::Output| {
|
|
|
|
self.stempool
|
|
|
|
.get_internal_spent_output(&x.commitment())
|
|
|
|
.or(self.stempool.get_available_output(&x.commitment()))
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
.filter_map(|x| x.source_hash())
|
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
// now iterate over all conflicting hashes from both txs and outputs
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// we can just use the union of the two sets here to remove duplicates
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
for &txh in conflicting_txs.union(&conflicting_outputs) {
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.mark_transaction(txh, &mut marked_transactions, false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Do the same for the stempool
|
|
|
|
for &txh in conflicting_stem_txs.union(&conflicting_stem_outputs) {
|
|
|
|
self.mark_transaction(txh, &mut marked_stem_transactions, true);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let freed_txs = self.sweep_transactions(marked_transactions, false);
|
|
|
|
let freed_stem_txs = self.sweep_transactions(marked_stem_transactions, true);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.reconcile_orphans().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// Return something else here ?
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Ok(freed_txs)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// The mark portion of our mark-and-sweep pool cleanup.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// The transaction designated by conflicting_tx is immediately marked.
|
|
|
|
/// Each output of this transaction is then examined; if a transaction in
|
|
|
|
/// the pool spends this output and the output is not replaced by an
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
/// identical output included in the updated Output set, the child is marked
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// as well and the process continues recursively.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Marked transactions are added to the mutable marked_txs HashMap which
|
|
|
|
/// is supplied by the calling function.
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
fn mark_transaction(
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
conflicting_tx: hash::Hash,
|
|
|
|
marked_txs: &mut HashSet<hash::Hash>,
|
|
|
|
stem: bool,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
// we can stop recursively visiting txs if we have already seen this one
|
|
|
|
if marked_txs.contains(&conflicting_tx) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
marked_txs.insert(conflicting_tx);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
if stem {
|
|
|
|
let tx_ref = self.stem_transactions.get(&conflicting_tx);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
for output in &tx_ref.unwrap().outputs {
|
|
|
|
match self.stempool
|
|
|
|
.get_internal_spent_output(&output.commitment())
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => if self.blockchain.is_unspent(&x.output()).is_err() {
|
|
|
|
self.mark_transaction(x.destination_hash().unwrap(), marked_txs, true);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
let tx_ref = self.transactions.get(&conflicting_tx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for output in &tx_ref.unwrap().outputs {
|
|
|
|
match self.pool.get_internal_spent_output(&output.commitment()) {
|
|
|
|
Some(x) => if self.blockchain.is_unspent(&x.output()).is_err() {
|
|
|
|
self.mark_transaction(x.destination_hash().unwrap(), marked_txs, false);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
None => {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// The sweep portion of mark-and-sweep pool cleanup.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// The transactions that exist in the hashmap are removed from the
|
|
|
|
/// heap storage as well as the vertex set. Any incoming edges are removed
|
|
|
|
/// and added to a list of freed edges. Any outbound edges are removed from
|
|
|
|
/// both the graph and the list of freed edges. It is the responsibility of
|
|
|
|
/// this method to ensure that the list of freed edges (inputs) are
|
|
|
|
/// consistent.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// TODO: There's some iteration overlap between this and the mark step.
|
|
|
|
/// Additional bookkeeping in the mark step could optimize that away.
|
|
|
|
fn sweep_transactions(
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
marked_transactions: HashSet<hash::Hash>,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
stem: bool,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
) -> Vec<Box<transaction::Transaction>> {
|
|
|
|
let mut removed_txs = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
if stem {
|
|
|
|
for tx_hash in &marked_transactions {
|
|
|
|
let removed_tx = self.stem_transactions.remove(&tx_hash).unwrap();
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
self.stempool
|
|
|
|
.remove_pool_transaction(&removed_tx, &marked_transactions);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
removed_txs.push(removed_tx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// final step is to update the pool to reflect the new set of roots
|
|
|
|
// a tx that was non-root may now be root based on the txs removed
|
|
|
|
self.stempool.update_roots();
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
for tx_hash in &marked_transactions {
|
|
|
|
let removed_tx = self.transactions.remove(&tx_hash).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.pool
|
|
|
|
.remove_pool_transaction(&removed_tx, &marked_transactions);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
removed_txs.push(removed_tx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// final step is to update the pool to reflect the new set of roots
|
|
|
|
// a tx that was non-root may now be root based on the txs removed
|
|
|
|
self.pool.update_roots();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
removed_txs
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Fetch mineable transactions.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Select a set of mineable transactions for block building.
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// TODO - txs have lock_heights, so possible to have "invalid" (immature)
|
|
|
|
/// txs here?
|
|
|
|
///
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
pub fn prepare_mineable_transactions(
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
num_to_fetch: u32,
|
|
|
|
) -> Vec<Box<transaction::Transaction>> {
|
|
|
|
self.pool
|
|
|
|
.get_mineable_transactions(num_to_fetch)
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.map(|x| self.transactions.get(x).unwrap().clone())
|
|
|
|
.collect()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Remove tx from stempool
|
|
|
|
pub fn remove_from_stempool(&mut self, tx_hash: &Hash) {
|
|
|
|
self.stem_transactions.remove(&tx_hash);
|
|
|
|
self.time_stem_transactions.remove(&tx_hash);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Whether the transaction is acceptable to the pool, given both how
|
|
|
|
/// full the pool is and the transaction weight.
|
|
|
|
fn is_acceptable(&self, tx: &transaction::Transaction) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
if self.total_size() > self.config.max_pool_size {
|
|
|
|
// TODO evict old/large transactions instead
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::OverCapacity);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-10 20:30:34 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// for a basic transaction (1 input, 2 outputs) -
|
|
|
|
// (-1 * 1) + (4 * 2) + 1 = 8
|
|
|
|
// 8 * 10 = 80
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
if self.config.accept_fee_base > 0 {
|
|
|
|
let mut tx_weight = -1 * (tx.inputs.len() as i32) + (4 * tx.outputs.len() as i32) + 1;
|
|
|
|
if tx_weight < 1 {
|
|
|
|
tx_weight = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let threshold = (tx_weight as u64) * self.config.accept_fee_base;
|
2018-02-13 18:35:30 +03:00
|
|
|
if tx.fee() < threshold {
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::LowFeeTransaction(threshold));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the transaction is not in the stempool or in the pool
|
|
|
|
fn check_pools(&mut self, tx_hash: &Hash, stem: bool) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
// Check if the transaction is a stem transaction AND alreay in stempool.
|
|
|
|
// If this is the case, we reject the transaction.
|
|
|
|
if stem && self.stem_transactions.contains_key(&tx_hash) {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::AlreadyInStempool);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Now it leaves us with two cases:
|
|
|
|
// 1. The transaction is not a stem transaction and is in stempool. (false &&
|
|
|
|
// true) => The transaction has been fluffed by another node.
|
|
|
|
// It is okay too but we have to remove this transaction from our stempool
|
|
|
|
// before adding it in our transaction pool
|
|
|
|
// 2. The transaction is a stem transaction and is not in stempool. (true &&
|
|
|
|
// false). => Ok
|
|
|
|
// 3. The transaction is not a stem transaction is not in stempool (false &&
|
|
|
|
// false) => We have to check if the transaction is in the transaction
|
|
|
|
// pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Case number 1, maybe uneeded check
|
|
|
|
if self.stem_transactions.contains_key(&tx_hash) {
|
|
|
|
let mut tx: HashSet<hash::Hash> = HashSet::new();
|
|
|
|
tx.insert(tx_hash.clone());
|
|
|
|
debug!(
|
|
|
|
LOGGER,
|
|
|
|
"pool: check_pools: transaction has been fluffed - {}", &tx_hash,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let transaction = self.stem_transactions.remove(&tx_hash).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
self.time_stem_transactions.remove(&tx_hash);
|
|
|
|
self.stempool.remove_pool_transaction(&transaction, &tx);
|
|
|
|
// Case 3
|
|
|
|
} else if self.transactions.contains_key(&tx_hash) {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::AlreadyInPool);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the transaction is mature
|
|
|
|
fn is_mature(
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
tx: &transaction::Transaction,
|
|
|
|
head_header: &block::BlockHeader,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), PoolError> {
|
|
|
|
if head_header.height < tx.lock_height() {
|
|
|
|
return Err(PoolError::ImmatureTransaction {
|
|
|
|
lock_height: tx.lock_height(),
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
mod tests {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
|
|
use core::core::build;
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::global;
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
use blockchain::{DummyChain, DummyChainImpl, DummyOutputSet};
|
2017-11-01 02:20:55 +03:00
|
|
|
use util::secp;
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
use keychain::Keychain;
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
use std::sync::{Arc, RwLock};
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
use blake2;
|
2017-11-16 00:49:15 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::global::ChainTypes;
|
2018-03-16 22:04:31 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::{Proof, SwitchCommitHash};
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::hash::{Hash, Hashed};
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::pmmr::MerkleProof;
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
use core::core::target::Difficulty;
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
use types::PoolError::InvalidTx;
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
macro_rules! expect_output_parent {
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
($pool:expr, $expected:pat, $( $output:expr ),+ ) => {
|
|
|
|
$(
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match $pool
|
|
|
|
.search_for_best_output(
|
|
|
|
&OutputIdentifier::from_output(&test_output($output))
|
|
|
|
) {
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
$expected => {},
|
|
|
|
x => panic!(
|
|
|
|
"Unexpected result from output search for {:?}, got {:?}",
|
|
|
|
$output,
|
|
|
|
x,
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
)*
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// A basic test; add a pair of transactions to the pool.
|
|
|
|
fn test_basic_pool_add() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let parent_transaction = test_transaction(vec![5, 6, 7], vec![11, 3]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// We want this transaction to be rooted in the blockchain.
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(5))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(6))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(7))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(8));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prepare a second transaction, connected to the first.
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let child_transaction = test_transaction(vec![11, 3], vec![12]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// To mirror how this construction is intended to be used, the pool
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// is placed inside a RwLock.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&Arc::new(dummy_chain)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Take the write lock and add a pool entry
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, add the transaction rooted in the blockchain
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let result = write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), parent_transaction, false);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
if result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!("got an error adding parent tx: {:?}", result.err().unwrap());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, add the transaction connected as a child to the first
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let child_result =
|
|
|
|
write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), child_transaction, false);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if child_result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!(
|
|
|
|
"got an error adding child tx: {:?}",
|
|
|
|
child_result.err().unwrap()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// Now take the read lock and use a few exposed methods to check consistency
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.total_size(), 2);
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::PoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 12);
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::AlreadySpent{other_tx: _}, 11, 5);
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::BlockTransaction, 8);
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::Unknown, 20);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// A basic test; add a transaction to the pool and add the child to the
|
|
|
|
/// stempool
|
|
|
|
fn test_pool_stempool_add() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let parent_transaction = test_transaction(vec![5, 6, 7], vec![11, 3]);
|
|
|
|
// We want this transaction to be rooted in the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(5))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(6))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(7))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(8));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prepare a second transaction, connected to the first.
|
|
|
|
let child_transaction = test_transaction(vec![11, 3], vec![12]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// To mirror how this construction is intended to be used, the pool
|
|
|
|
// is placed inside a RwLock.
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&Arc::new(dummy_chain)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Take the write lock and add a pool entry
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, add the transaction rooted in the blockchain
|
|
|
|
let result = write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), parent_transaction, false);
|
|
|
|
if result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!("got an error adding parent tx: {:?}", result.err().unwrap());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, add the transaction connected as a child to the first
|
|
|
|
let child_result =
|
|
|
|
write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), child_transaction, true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if child_result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!(
|
|
|
|
"got an error adding child tx: {:?}",
|
|
|
|
child_result.err().unwrap()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now take the read lock and use a few exposed methods to check consistency
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.total_size(), 2);
|
|
|
|
if read_pool.stempool.num_transactions() == 0 {
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::PoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 12);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::StemPoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 12);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::AlreadySpent{other_tx: _}, 11, 5);
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::BlockTransaction, 8);
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::Unknown, 20);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// A basic test; add a transaction to the stempool and one the regular transaction pool
|
|
|
|
/// Child transaction should be added to the stempool.
|
|
|
|
fn test_stempool_pool_add() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let parent_transaction = test_transaction(vec![5, 6, 7], vec![11, 3]);
|
|
|
|
// We want this transaction to be rooted in the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(5))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(6))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(7))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(8));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prepare a second transaction, connected to the first.
|
|
|
|
let child_transaction = test_transaction(vec![11, 3], vec![12]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// To mirror how this construction is intended to be used, the pool
|
|
|
|
// is placed inside a RwLock.
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&Arc::new(dummy_chain)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Take the write lock and add a pool entry
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, add the transaction rooted in the blockchain
|
|
|
|
let result = write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), parent_transaction, true);
|
|
|
|
if result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!("got an error adding parent tx: {:?}", result.err().unwrap());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, add the transaction connected as a child to the first
|
|
|
|
let child_result =
|
|
|
|
write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), child_transaction, false);
|
|
|
|
if child_result.is_err() {
|
|
|
|
panic!(
|
|
|
|
"got an error adding child tx: {:?}",
|
|
|
|
child_result.err().unwrap()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now take the read lock and use a few exposed methods to check consistency
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// First transaction is a stem transaction. In that case the child transaction
|
|
|
|
// should be force stem
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.total_size(), 2);
|
|
|
|
// Parent has been directly fluffed
|
|
|
|
if read_pool.stempool.num_transactions() == 0 {
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::PoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 12);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::StemPoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 12);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::AlreadySpent{other_tx: _}, 11, 5);
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::BlockTransaction, 8);
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::Unknown, 20);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// Testing various expected error conditions
|
|
|
|
pub fn test_pool_add_error() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(5))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(6))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(7));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&Arc::new(dummy_chain)));
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First expected failure: duplicate output
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let duplicate_tx = test_transaction(vec![5, 6], vec![7]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), duplicate_tx, false) {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Ok(_) => panic!("Got OK from add_to_memory_pool when dup was expected"),
|
|
|
|
Err(x) => {
|
|
|
|
match x {
|
|
|
|
PoolError::DuplicateOutput {
|
|
|
|
other_tx,
|
|
|
|
in_chain,
|
|
|
|
output,
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
} => if other_tx.is_some() || !in_chain
|
|
|
|
|| output != test_output(7).commitment()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
panic!("Unexpected parameter in DuplicateOutput: {:?}", x);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
_ => panic!(
|
|
|
|
"Unexpected error when adding duplicate output transaction: {:?}",
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// To test DoubleSpend and AlreadyInPool conditions, we need to add
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// a valid transaction.
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let valid_transaction = test_transaction(vec![5, 6], vec![9]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), valid_transaction.clone(), false) {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Ok(_) => {}
|
|
|
|
Err(x) => panic!("Unexpected error while adding a valid transaction: {:?}", x),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, test a DoubleSpend by consuming the same blockchain unspent
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// as valid_transaction:
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let double_spend_transaction = test_transaction(vec![6], vec![2]);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), double_spend_transaction, false) {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error when adding double spend, got Ok"),
|
|
|
|
Err(x) => {
|
|
|
|
match x {
|
|
|
|
PoolError::DoubleSpend {
|
|
|
|
other_tx: _,
|
|
|
|
spent_output,
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
} => if spent_output != test_output(6).commitment() {
|
|
|
|
panic!("Unexpected parameter in DoubleSpend: {:?}", x);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
_ => panic!(
|
|
|
|
"Unexpected error when adding double spend transaction: {:?}",
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-10 22:36:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// Note, this used to work as expected, but after aggsig implementation
|
|
|
|
// creating another transaction with the same inputs/outputs doesn't create
|
|
|
|
// the same hash ID due to the random nonces in an aggsig. This
|
|
|
|
// will instead throw a (correct as well) Already spent error. An AlreadyInPool
|
|
|
|
// error can only come up in the case of the exact same transaction being
|
|
|
|
// added
|
|
|
|
//let already_in_pool = test_transaction(vec![5, 6], vec![9]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), valid_transaction, false) {
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error when adding already in pool, got Ok"),
|
|
|
|
Err(x) => {
|
|
|
|
match x {
|
|
|
|
PoolError::AlreadyInPool => {}
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
_ => panic!("Unexpected error when adding already in pool tx: {:?}", x),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 1);
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now attempt to add a timelocked tx to the pool
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// should fail as invalid based on current height
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let timelocked_tx_1 = timelocked_transaction(vec![9], vec![5], 10);
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
match write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), timelocked_tx_1, false) {
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
Err(PoolError::ImmatureTransaction {
|
|
|
|
lock_height: height,
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(height, 10);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Err(e) => panic!("expected ImmatureTransaction error here - {:?}", e),
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => panic!("expected ImmatureTransaction error here"),
|
|
|
|
};
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_immature_coinbase() {
|
2017-11-16 00:49:15 +03:00
|
|
|
global::set_mining_mode(ChainTypes::AutomatedTesting);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
2018-03-16 22:04:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let proof_size = global::proofsize();
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let lock_height = 1 + global::coinbase_maturity();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(lock_height, 4);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let coinbase_output = test_coinbase_output(15);
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(DummyOutputSet::empty().with_output(coinbase_output));
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chain_ref = Arc::new(dummy_chain);
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&chain_ref));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let coinbase_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
2018-03-16 22:04:31 +03:00
|
|
|
pow: Proof::random(proof_size),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
chain_ref.store_head_header(&coinbase_header);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 2,
|
2018-03-16 22:04:31 +03:00
|
|
|
pow: Proof::random(proof_size),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
chain_ref.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let txn = test_transaction_with_coinbase_input(15, coinbase_header.hash(), vec![10, 3]);
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let result = write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), txn, false);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
match result {
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
Err(InvalidTx(transaction::Error::ImmatureCoinbase)) => {}
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
_ => panic!("expected ImmatureCoinbase error here"),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
height: 4,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
chain_ref.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let txn = test_transaction_with_coinbase_input(15, coinbase_header.hash(), vec![10, 3]);
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let result = write_pool.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), txn, false);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
match result {
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => {}
|
|
|
|
Err(_) => panic!("this should not return an error here"),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// Testing an expected orphan
|
|
|
|
fn test_add_orphan() {
|
|
|
|
// TODO we need a test here
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_zero_confirmation_reconciliation() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// single Output
|
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty().with_output(test_output(100));
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
let chain_ref = Arc::new(dummy_chain);
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&chain_ref));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now create two txs
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
// tx1 spends the Output
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// tx2 spends output from tx1
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
let tx1 = test_transaction(vec![100], vec![90]);
|
|
|
|
let tx2 = test_transaction(vec![90], vec![80]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now add both txs to the pool (tx2 spends tx1 with zero confirmations)
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// both should be accepted if tx1 added before tx2
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
write_pool
|
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), tx1, false)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), tx2, false)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap();
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.pool_size(), 2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let txs: Vec<transaction::Transaction>;
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let mut mineable_txs = read_pool.prepare_mineable_transactions(3);
|
|
|
|
txs = mineable_txs.drain(..).map(|x| *x).collect();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-19 02:23:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// confirm we can preparing both txs for mining here
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// one root tx in the pool, and one non-root vertex in the pool
|
2017-10-19 02:23:37 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(txs.len(), 2);
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let keychain = Keychain::from_random_seed().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(1).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now "mine" the block passing in the mineable txs from earlier
|
|
|
|
let block = block::Block::new(
|
|
|
|
&block::BlockHeader::default(),
|
|
|
|
txs.iter().collect(),
|
|
|
|
&keychain,
|
|
|
|
&key_id,
|
2018-01-27 10:48:53 +03:00
|
|
|
Difficulty::one(),
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now apply the block to ensure the chainstate is updated before we reconcile
|
|
|
|
chain_ref.apply_block(&block);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// now reconcile the block
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// we should evict both txs here
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let evicted_transactions = write_pool.reconcile_block(&block).unwrap();
|
2017-10-19 02:23:37 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(evicted_transactions.len(), 2);
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check the pool is consistent after reconciling the block
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// we should have zero txs in the pool (neither roots nor non-roots)
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
2017-10-19 02:23:37 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.pool.len_vertices(), 0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.pool.len_roots(), 0);
|
2017-10-18 23:42:51 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// Testing block reconciliation
|
|
|
|
fn test_block_reconciliation() {
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(10))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(20))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(30))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(40));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chain_ref = Arc::new(dummy_chain);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&chain_ref));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Preparation: We will introduce a three root pool transactions.
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// 1. A transaction that should be invalidated because it is exactly
|
|
|
|
// contained in the block.
|
|
|
|
// 2. A transaction that should be invalidated because the input is
|
|
|
|
// consumed in the block, although it is not exactly consumed.
|
|
|
|
// 3. A transaction that should remain after block reconciliation.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_transaction = test_transaction(vec![10], vec![8]);
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let conflict_transaction = test_transaction(vec![20], vec![12, 6]);
|
|
|
|
let valid_transaction = test_transaction(vec![30], vec![13, 15]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We will also introduce a few children:
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// 4. A transaction that descends from transaction 1, that is in
|
|
|
|
// turn exactly contained in the block.
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_child = test_transaction(vec![8], vec![5, 1]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 5. A transaction that descends from transaction 4, that is not
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// contained in the block at all and should be valid after
|
|
|
|
// reconciliation.
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let pool_child = test_transaction(vec![5], vec![3]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 6. A transaction that descends from transaction 2 that does not
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
// conflict with anything in the block in any way, but should be
|
|
|
|
// invalidated (orphaned).
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let conflict_child = test_transaction(vec![12], vec![2]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 7. A transaction that descends from transaction 2 that should be
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// valid due to its inputs being satisfied by the block.
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let conflict_valid_child = test_transaction(vec![6], vec![4]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 8. A transaction that descends from transaction 3 that should be
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// invalidated due to an output conflict.
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let valid_child_conflict = test_transaction(vec![13], vec![9]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 9. A transaction that descends from transaction 3 that should remain
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// valid after reconciliation.
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let valid_child_valid = test_transaction(vec![15], vec![11]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// 10. A transaction that descends from both transaction 6 and
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// transaction 9
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let mixed_child = test_transaction(vec![2, 11], vec![7]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add transactions.
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// Note: There are some ordering constraints that must be followed here
|
|
|
|
// until orphans is 100% implemented. Once the orphans process has
|
|
|
|
// stabilized, we can mix these up to exercise that path a bit.
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let mut txs_to_add = vec![
|
|
|
|
block_transaction,
|
|
|
|
conflict_transaction,
|
|
|
|
valid_transaction,
|
|
|
|
block_child,
|
|
|
|
pool_child,
|
|
|
|
conflict_child,
|
|
|
|
conflict_valid_child,
|
|
|
|
valid_child_conflict,
|
|
|
|
valid_child_valid,
|
|
|
|
mixed_child,
|
|
|
|
];
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let expected_pool_size = txs_to_add.len();
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// First we add the above transactions to the pool; all should be
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// accepted.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
for tx in txs_to_add.drain(..) {
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
write_pool
|
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), tx, false)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap();
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), expected_pool_size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now we prepare the block that will cause the above condition.
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// First, the transactions we want in the block:
|
|
|
|
// - Copy of 1
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_tx_1 = test_transaction(vec![10], vec![8]);
|
|
|
|
// - Conflict w/ 2, satisfies 7
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_tx_2 = test_transaction(vec![20], vec![6]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// - Copy of 4
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_tx_3 = test_transaction(vec![8], vec![5, 1]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// - Output conflict w/ 8
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_tx_4 = test_transaction(vec![40], vec![9, 1]);
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_transactions = vec![&block_tx_1, &block_tx_2, &block_tx_3, &block_tx_4];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let keychain = Keychain::from_random_seed().unwrap();
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(1).unwrap();
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let block = block::Block::new(
|
|
|
|
&block::BlockHeader::default(),
|
|
|
|
block_transactions,
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
&keychain,
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
&key_id,
|
2018-01-27 10:48:53 +03:00
|
|
|
Difficulty::one(),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
).unwrap();
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
chain_ref.apply_block(&block);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// Block reconciliation
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let evicted_transactions = write_pool.reconcile_block(&block);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert!(evicted_transactions.is_ok());
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(evicted_transactions.unwrap().len(), 6);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// TODO: Txids are not yet deterministic. When they are, we should
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// check the specific transactions that were evicted.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// Using the pool's methods to validate a few end conditions.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(read_pool.total_size(), 4);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
// We should have available blockchain outputs
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::BlockTransaction, 9, 1);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
// We should have spent blockchain outputs
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::AlreadySpent{other_tx: _}, 5, 6);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
// We should have spent pool references
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::AlreadySpent{other_tx: _}, 15);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
// We should have unspent pool references
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::PoolTransaction{tx_ref: _}, 3, 11, 13);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// References internal to the block should be unknown
|
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::Unknown, 8);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
// Evicted transactions should have unknown outputs
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
expect_output_parent!(read_pool, Parent::Unknown, 2, 7);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-10 03:54:10 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
/// Test transaction selection and block building.
|
|
|
|
fn test_block_building() {
|
|
|
|
// Add a handful of transactions
|
|
|
|
let mut dummy_chain = DummyChainImpl::new();
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let head_header = block::BlockHeader {
|
|
|
|
height: 1,
|
|
|
|
..block::BlockHeader::default()
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
dummy_chain.store_head_header(&head_header);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
let new_output = DummyOutputSet::empty()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(10))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(20))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(30))
|
|
|
|
.with_output(test_output(40));
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 22:33:44 +03:00
|
|
|
dummy_chain.update_output_set(new_output);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let chain_ref = Arc::new(dummy_chain);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let pool = RwLock::new(test_setup(&chain_ref));
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let root_tx_1 = test_transaction(vec![10, 20], vec![24]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let root_tx_2 = test_transaction(vec![30], vec![28]);
|
|
|
|
let root_tx_3 = test_transaction(vec![40], vec![38]);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 12:52:01 +03:00
|
|
|
let child_tx_1 = test_transaction(vec![24], vec![22]);
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let child_tx_2 = test_transaction(vec![38], vec![32]);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 0);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), root_tx_1, false)
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
.is_ok()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), root_tx_2, false)
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
.is_ok()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), root_tx_3, false)
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
.is_ok()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), child_tx_1, false)
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
.is_ok()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
write_pool
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
.add_to_memory_pool(test_source(), child_tx_2, false)
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
.is_ok()
|
|
|
|
);
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 5);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Request blocks
|
|
|
|
let block: block::Block;
|
|
|
|
let mut txs: Vec<Box<transaction::Transaction>>;
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let read_pool = pool.read().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
txs = read_pool.prepare_mineable_transactions(3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(txs.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
// TODO: This is ugly, either make block::new take owned
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// txs instead of mut refs, or change
|
|
|
|
// prepare_mineable_transactions to return mut refs
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
let block_txs: Vec<transaction::Transaction> = txs.drain(..).map(|x| *x).collect();
|
|
|
|
let tx_refs = block_txs.iter().collect();
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let keychain = Keychain::from_random_seed().unwrap();
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(1).unwrap();
|
2018-01-12 21:35:37 +03:00
|
|
|
block = block::Block::new(
|
|
|
|
&block::BlockHeader::default(),
|
|
|
|
tx_refs,
|
|
|
|
&keychain,
|
|
|
|
&key_id,
|
2018-01-27 10:48:53 +03:00
|
|
|
Difficulty::one(),
|
2018-01-12 21:35:37 +03:00
|
|
|
).unwrap();
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chain_ref.apply_block(&block);
|
|
|
|
// Reconcile block
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
let mut write_pool = pool.write().unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let evicted_transactions = write_pool.reconcile_block(&block);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(evicted_transactions.is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(evicted_transactions.unwrap().len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(write_pool.total_size(), 2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_setup(dummy_chain: &Arc<DummyChainImpl>) -> TransactionPool<DummyChainImpl> {
|
|
|
|
TransactionPool {
|
2017-10-10 20:30:34 +03:00
|
|
|
config: PoolConfig {
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
accept_fee_base: 0,
|
|
|
|
max_pool_size: 10_000,
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
dandelion_probability: 90,
|
|
|
|
dandelion_embargo: 30,
|
2017-10-07 21:24:11 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
time_stem_transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
|
|
|
stem_transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
transactions: HashMap::new(),
|
2018-03-20 06:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
stempool: Pool::empty(),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
pool: Pool::empty(),
|
|
|
|
orphans: Orphans::empty(),
|
|
|
|
blockchain: dummy_chain.clone(),
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
adapter: Arc::new(NoopAdapter {}),
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Cobble together a test transaction for testing the transaction pool.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Connectivity here is the most important element.
|
|
|
|
/// Every output is given a blinding key equal to its value, so that the
|
|
|
|
/// entire commitment can be derived deterministically from just the value.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Fees are the remainder between input and output values,
|
|
|
|
/// so the numbers should make sense.
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
fn test_transaction(
|
|
|
|
input_values: Vec<u64>,
|
|
|
|
output_values: Vec<u64>,
|
|
|
|
) -> transaction::Transaction {
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let keychain = keychain_for_tests();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let input_sum = input_values.iter().sum::<u64>() as i64;
|
|
|
|
let output_sum = output_values.iter().sum::<u64>() as i64;
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let fees: i64 = input_sum - output_sum;
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
assert!(fees >= 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut tx_elements = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for input_value in input_values {
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(input_value as u32).unwrap();
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::input(input_value, key_id));
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for output_value in output_values {
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(output_value as u32).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::output(output_value, key_id));
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::with_fee(fees as u64));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-13 18:35:30 +03:00
|
|
|
build::transaction(tx_elements, &keychain).unwrap()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
fn test_transaction_with_coinbase_input(
|
|
|
|
input_value: u64,
|
|
|
|
input_block_hash: Hash,
|
|
|
|
output_values: Vec<u64>,
|
|
|
|
) -> transaction::Transaction {
|
|
|
|
let keychain = keychain_for_tests();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let output_sum = output_values.iter().sum::<u64>() as i64;
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let fees: i64 = input_value as i64 - output_sum;
|
|
|
|
assert!(fees >= 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut tx_elements = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
let merkle_proof = MerkleProof {
|
|
|
|
node: Hash::zero(),
|
|
|
|
root: Hash::zero(),
|
|
|
|
peaks: vec![Hash::zero()],
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
..MerkleProof::default()
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(input_value as u32).unwrap();
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::coinbase_input(
|
|
|
|
input_value,
|
|
|
|
input_block_hash,
|
|
|
|
merkle_proof,
|
|
|
|
key_id,
|
|
|
|
));
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for output_value in output_values {
|
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(output_value as u32).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::output(output_value, key_id));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::with_fee(fees as u64));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-13 18:35:30 +03:00
|
|
|
build::transaction(tx_elements, &keychain).unwrap()
|
2018-01-17 06:03:40 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Very un-dry way of building a vanilla tx and adding a lock_height to it.
|
|
|
|
/// TODO - rethink this.
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
fn timelocked_transaction(
|
|
|
|
input_values: Vec<u64>,
|
|
|
|
output_values: Vec<u64>,
|
|
|
|
lock_height: u64,
|
|
|
|
) -> transaction::Transaction {
|
|
|
|
let keychain = keychain_for_tests();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-01 02:32:33 +03:00
|
|
|
let fees: i64 =
|
|
|
|
input_values.iter().sum::<u64>() as i64 - output_values.iter().sum::<u64>() as i64;
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
assert!(fees >= 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut tx_elements = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for input_value in input_values {
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(input_value as u32).unwrap();
|
2018-03-02 23:47:27 +03:00
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::input(input_value, key_id));
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for output_value in output_values {
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(output_value as u32).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::output(output_value, key_id));
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::with_fee(fees as u64));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tx_elements.push(build::with_lock_height(lock_height));
|
2018-02-13 18:35:30 +03:00
|
|
|
build::transaction(tx_elements, &keychain).unwrap()
|
2017-10-11 21:12:01 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
/// Deterministically generate an output defined by our test scheme
|
|
|
|
fn test_output(value: u64) -> transaction::Output {
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let keychain = keychain_for_tests();
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(value as u32).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let commit = keychain.commit(value, &key_id).unwrap();
|
2017-10-17 00:23:10 +03:00
|
|
|
let switch_commit = keychain.switch_commit(&key_id).unwrap();
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let switch_commit_hash =
|
|
|
|
SwitchCommitHash::from_switch_commit(switch_commit, &keychain, &key_id);
|
2017-10-06 00:40:46 +03:00
|
|
|
let msg = secp::pedersen::ProofMessage::empty();
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let proof = keychain
|
|
|
|
.range_proof(
|
|
|
|
value,
|
|
|
|
&key_id,
|
|
|
|
commit,
|
|
|
|
Some(switch_commit_hash.as_ref().to_vec()),
|
|
|
|
msg,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap();
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
transaction::Output {
|
2018-02-05 22:43:54 +03:00
|
|
|
features: transaction::OutputFeatures::DEFAULT_OUTPUT,
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
commit: commit,
|
2017-10-17 00:23:10 +03:00
|
|
|
switch_commit_hash: switch_commit_hash,
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
proof: proof,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Deterministically generate a coinbase output defined by our test scheme
|
|
|
|
fn test_coinbase_output(value: u64) -> transaction::Output {
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
let keychain = keychain_for_tests();
|
2017-10-13 07:45:07 +03:00
|
|
|
let key_id = keychain.derive_key_id(value as u32).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let commit = keychain.commit(value, &key_id).unwrap();
|
2017-10-17 00:23:10 +03:00
|
|
|
let switch_commit = keychain.switch_commit(&key_id).unwrap();
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let switch_commit_hash =
|
|
|
|
SwitchCommitHash::from_switch_commit(switch_commit, &keychain, &key_id);
|
2017-10-06 00:40:46 +03:00
|
|
|
let msg = secp::pedersen::ProofMessage::empty();
|
2018-03-04 03:19:54 +03:00
|
|
|
let proof = keychain
|
|
|
|
.range_proof(
|
|
|
|
value,
|
|
|
|
&key_id,
|
|
|
|
commit,
|
|
|
|
Some(switch_commit_hash.as_ref().to_vec()),
|
|
|
|
msg,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.unwrap();
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
transaction::Output {
|
2018-02-05 22:43:54 +03:00
|
|
|
features: transaction::OutputFeatures::COINBASE_OUTPUT,
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
commit: commit,
|
2017-10-17 00:23:10 +03:00
|
|
|
switch_commit_hash: switch_commit_hash,
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
proof: proof,
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-03 03:02:31 +03:00
|
|
|
fn keychain_for_tests() -> Keychain {
|
|
|
|
let seed = "pool_tests";
|
|
|
|
let seed = blake2::blake2b::blake2b(32, &[], seed.as_bytes());
|
|
|
|
Keychain::from_seed(seed.as_bytes()).unwrap()
|
2017-09-29 21:44:25 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// A generic TxSource representing a test
|
|
|
|
fn test_source() -> TxSource {
|
|
|
|
TxSource {
|
|
|
|
debug_name: "test".to_string(),
|
|
|
|
identifier: "127.0.0.1".to_string(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-19 18:22:08 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|